Trevor Ruddock
Allegation / charges
Struck off, Repayment & Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 13, 2010. View PDF JUDGEMENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE COMPLAINT NO. 74 OF 2003 BETWEEN JOAN BURKETT POWELL COMPLAINANT AND TREVOR RUDDOCK RESPONDENT PANEL: PAMELA E BENKA-COKER …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Trevor Ruddock, an attorney with carriage of sale of a property at 117 Great Georges Street, received $10,000,000 deposit but failed to complete the sale, stamp the agreement, account to the beneficiary/client, or hand over funds. The Disciplinary Committee found beyond reasonable doubt that he dishonestly misappropriated $6,880,159 and committed professional misconduct, breaching Canons IV(r), VII(b)(ii) and I(b). He was struck off the Roll, ordered to make restitution of $6,880,159 plus 12% interest, pay 12% interest on the $2,500,000 deposit, and pay $100,000 costs. He was found not guilty of inexcusable/deplorable negligence.
Duties found breached:
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonest misappropriation of $6,880,159.00 of client funds converted to his own use
- Position of trust/fiduciary relationship breached
- Failure to account or hand over funds despite client instructions
- Prolonged delay (sale agreement signed 2002, unresolved by 2008)
- No evidence produced that funds were still held in trust
Mitigating factors:
- Attorney paid over $2,500,000.00 to the complainant's new attorneys in April 2008
- Did pursue application to bring land under Registration of Titles Act and made some correspondence with the National Land Agency
- Did pay land taxes on the property
Duties engaged
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/trevor-ruddock-complaint-no-74-of-2003/