§ discipline
‹ Back

Rajinder Heer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12499/2023
Date15/03/2024
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 10,966
Dishonesty foundYes

Rajinder Heer, owner/director and COLP/COFA of Coventgate Law Limited, continued to undertake legal practice activities between October 2021 and February 2022 without qualifying professional indemnity insurance after the cessation period ended, instead of closing the firm as required. He gave misleading information to the SRA, intervention agents, a third-party firm (HCR) and clients about the number of live matters and the firm's insurance position, and failed to maintain proper books of account, client reconciliations and accountants' reports throughout 2018-2022. He did not engage with proceedings or attend the hearing. The Tribunal found all three allegations proved in full and expressly found that he had acted deliberately and dishonestly in concealing the position (applying Ivey), as well as lacking integrity. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £10,966.36.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Conduct was deliberate and dishonest
  • Repeatedly misled the SRA, intervention agents, third parties and clients
  • Put clients at risk of loss without insurance protection
  • Failure to engage with the disciplinary proceedings
  • Sole director responsible for running the firm; held COLP and COFA roles

Mitigating factors:

  • Cited difficult personal circumstances at the relevant time
  • Expressed confusion over interpreting the rules and acknowledged failing clients/public trust

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12499/