§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Catherine Bong & Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9566
Date01/01/1970
OutcomeFine, Suspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 15,000
CostsGBP 17,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Consolidated proceedings against two solicitors of B & W Law LLP. Respondent 1 was found to have breached the Solicitors' Accounts Rules (round-sum transfers, overpayment, poor records, failure to remedy), taken Court of Protection costs without assessment, provided misleading costs information, failed to disclose to a lender, completed a misleading Certificate of Title, failed to file multiple Accountant's Reports, ignored Law Society correspondence and Adjudicator directions. No dishonesty was alleged or found. He was fined £15,000, ordered to pay £17,000 costs, and from 26 April 2008 restricted to approved employment; two IPS awards were made enforceable as High Court orders. Mrs Bong was found to have given misleading costs information and submitted an inaccurate PII proposal; the Tribunal endorsed her existing indefinite suspension and ordered £4,000 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Chaotic state of accounts and failure to put matters right without delay
  • Multiple regulatory failures across several practices
  • Attempting to avoid personal responsibility for inadequate professional service awards by relying on a technical LLP defence
  • Mrs Bong already subject to indefinite suspension and prior disciplinary findings

Mitigating factors:

  • Catastrophic computer/server crash destroying accounting records, beyond his control
  • No dishonesty alleged or found against Respondent 1
  • Overpayment to clients repaid
  • Instructed accountants to reconstruct records and filed some reports
  • Attempted (mistakenly) to be transparent with clients about charges; widespread practice in profession
  • Lenders aware of the builder discounts
  • Attended hearing and apologised; practising as locum
  • Mrs Bong's actions partly due to inexperience and ill health; insurers were in fact aware of the true position

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9566-9775/