§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Rashvinderjeet Panesar

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodyBar Tribunals & Adjudication Service (BTAS)
Professionbarrister — Gray's Inn
Hearing5 Person Tribunal
AppealFinal

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionReprimand
CostsGBP 2,100
Dishonesty foundNo

The Respondent, a barrister of Lincoln's Inn, admitted two charges of professional misconduct for sending grossly offensive Instagram messages to a former partner (Person A) in early January 2021 for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety. The conduct breached Conduct Rule 8 (integrity) and Core Duty 5. He had received a conditional police caution and self-referred to the BSB. The Tribunal found the messages grossly offensive but noted they were not a prolonged course of conduct, were the product of a private dispute, and were out of character. Considering significant mitigation, the Tribunal unanimously imposed a reprimand, declined to impose a fine given his financial position, and ordered costs of £2,100 (including VAT).

Duties found breached:

Mitigating factors:

  • Communications occurred during a toxic relationship breakdown that affected the Respondent
  • Respondent made a genuine and sincere apology
  • Immediately self-reported to and cooperated with the BSB
  • Events occurred two and a half years before the hearing
  • No previous disciplinary record and no repetition of behaviour
  • Messages were not a prolonged course of conduct and did not persist
  • Conduct was out of character and product of a private dispute, not professional practice
  • Respondent had a period of low mood and heightened anxiety at the time, since recovered
  • Messages were not placed in the public domain
  • Recipient herself used social media to cause upset/denigrated him

Panel

His Honour James Meston KC (Chair); Ms Desirée Artesi; Mr Peter Causton; Ms Tracy Stephenson; Ms Rhona Stevens

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.tbtas.org.uk/hearings/findings-and-sentences-of-past-hearings/