§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Christopher Kenneth Grierson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10981/2012
Date01/01/2012
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Criminal Convictions, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 7,238
Dishonesty foundYes

Francis Michael Bridgeman, a solicitor, was convicted at Lewes Crown Court of perverting the course of public justice after falsely telling police he had been kidnapped at knifepoint to conceal that he had crashed his car while driving with excess alcohol. He also pleaded guilty to driving with excess alcohol and driving without due care and attention, and received a (subsequently suspended on appeal) custodial sentence. The conduct was personal, not professional. The Tribunal found both allegations substantiated (admitted by the Respondent) and made an express finding of dishonesty under the Twinsectra test. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £7,238.40.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Respondent was a solicitor and officer of the court
  • Deliberate lies maintained throughout the police investigation
  • Conduct triggered a significant police investigation (~200 hours)
  • Damaged reputation of the profession and public confidence in the administration of justice

Mitigating factors:

  • Previous good character / no prior disciplinary matters
  • Conviction did not arise from professional work
  • Cooperated with the SRA and did not contest the application
  • Self-reported to the SRA
  • Serious ill-health of the Respondent's wife and difficult personal circumstances
  • Expressed contrition and chose not to renew his practising certificate

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 10981/2012 2012-01-01 · SDT · England & Wales · Strike off

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10981/