§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

A Afolabi, A Otah & O Ogunjebe

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10069/2008
Date01/01/2008
OutcomeFine, Strike off, Suspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
FineGBP 10,000
CostsGBP 62,828
Dishonesty foundYes

In this SDT decision concerning the firm Ann Francis & Co (and Austin & Jedd), the Tribunal found that Mrs Afolabi controlled and ran a sham solicitors' partnership both before and after admission, that misleading publicity was provided, and that she gave dishonest evidence to an Employment Tribunal (allegation I). The Tribunal made an express finding of dishonesty against Mrs Afolabi and ordered she be struck off the Roll. Respondent 2, who admitted accounts breaches and being held out as a partner, was fined £10,000. Augustine Otah and Oludayo Ogunjebe were each indefinitely suspended for failing to produce books of account, comply with an Adjudicator's directions, and (Otah) honour a professional undertaking. Costs (total schedule £62,828.06) were ordered subject to detailed assessment and apportioned among the respondents. The case header notes the High Court later quashed and remitted the findings on allegation I and Afolabi's sanction.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Express finding of dishonesty in evidence to the Employment Tribunal
  • Operating a sham partnership to obtain lender panel status
  • Mrs Afolabi controlled and ran the firm before being admitted as a solicitor
  • Clients placed at risk; profession brought into disrepute
  • Otah's complete disregard of the regulator's powers and failure to comply with directions and undertaking

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary findings
  • Firm had no client complaints and provided legal services and training
  • Mrs Afolabi expressed remorse and accepted some findings
  • Respondent 2 made early admissions to the accounts allegations

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10069/