§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

David John Christensen

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9528/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

David John Christensen, a sole practitioner admitted in 1967, faced eight allegations following a Law Society inspection that found a client account shortage of £33,312.79 linked to misuse of client JT's Escrow funds, plus misuse of charitable funds (CGSEF) of which he was clerk for 25 years. He admitted breaches of the Solicitors' Accounts Rules and conflict of interest regarding loans taken from clients. The Tribunal found allegations 1-7 substantiated. On allegation 8, it found dishonesty proven (applying the Twinsectra test) in relation to taking charity money to bolster his office account without informing the chairperson or governors, being sure he had no honest belief in authority. Dishonesty in relation to JT was not pursued due to a procedural misunderstanding. The Respondent was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs subject to detailed assessment.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Position of trust as clerk to charity for 25 years and as its solicitor
  • Covert course of conduct over multiple years using charity funds via blank cheques signed by governors
  • No loan agreement, security, interest or independent legal advice for client/charity loans
  • Repaying funds before financial year end then re-borrowing
  • Steps to rectify cash shortage only commenced after inspection began
  • Misrepresented position to client JT regarding Escrow account funds

Mitigating factors:

  • Long and previously unblemished career since 1967 with no prior complaints
  • Positive testimonials and continued client confidence
  • Ill health (heart condition) and stress at relevant time
  • Funds ultimately repaid; no client suffered loss except lost interest
  • Cooperation and admissions to allegations 4-7

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9528/