Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Michelle Niaz

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12767/2025
Date17/02/2026
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Authorisation of Individuals Regulations 2019, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension9 months
CostsGBP 22,140
Dishonesty foundNo

Michelle Niaz, a solicitor and sole partner/COLP/COFA of Lewis Mitchell Solicitors, admitted three allegations: practising as a sole practitioner without authorisation after the firm lost its authorisation on 17 January 2020 (following her partner's departure) and continuing until closure on 1 September 2023; holding substantial client monies when not in an authorised body; and failing to maintain proper accounting records (missing reconciliations and accountant's reports over six years). The allegation of recklessness was withdrawn. The Tribunal found lack of integrity but no dishonesty was alleged or found. Resolved by agreed outcome, the Tribunal imposed a 9-month suspension followed by indefinite practising conditions and ordered costs of £22,140.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct was repeated, ongoing and wide-ranging in scope
  • Breaches persisted for several years (over three years unauthorised; over six years of accounting failures)
  • Respondent had direct control and responsibility and was an experienced solicitor aware of her responsibilities
  • Enhanced responsibilities as COLP and COFA
  • Clients placed at significant risk; substantial sums of client money held while unauthorised

Mitigating factors:

  • Cooperation with the SRA's investigation
  • Remedial steps taken including SRA Accounts Rules training, engagement of compliance consultants and bookkeeper, improved controls
  • Inexperience and unexpected loss of supervision when partners departed
  • Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ability to regularise authorisation
  • No dishonesty or deliberate wrongdoing; no evidence of client loss or personal gain
  • Insight and reflection; personal impact of prolonged proceedings

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12767/