Decision record
Nagle, Peter Richard
Allegation / charges
1. Engaged in legal practice in the period since 1 July 2016, contrary to section 10 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law 2. Represented himself as entitled to engage in legal practice in the period since 1 July 2016, contrary to section 11 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law 3. Continued to represent three co-accused in a criminal matter after he became aware that the interests of at least two of the co-accused were in conflict — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The practitioner was found to have engaged in legal practice and held himself out as entitled to do so since 1 July 2016 contrary to sections 10 and 11 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law, and to have continued representing three co-accused in a criminal matter despite an awareness of a conflict of interest between at least two of them, constituting unsatisfactory professional conduct. No express dishonesty finding and no sanction details are stated in the provided text.
Duties found breached:
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- No conflict between current clients
- Maintain competence and CPD
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail/?id=672e510a-b733-eb11-bf74-000d3ad1941e