Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Leslie Roy Campbell

JurisdictionJamaica
BodyGeneral Legal Council — Disciplinary Committee (GLC)
Professionattorney
Case number62 of 2017
DateMarch 26, 2019
OutcomeReprimanded, Fined

Allegation / charges

Reprimanded, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered March 26, 2019. View PDFs Decision Formal Order DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 62/2017 BETWEEN GEORGE ROBERT SMITH COMPLAINANT AND LESLIE ROY CAMPBELL RESPONDENT PANEL: …

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionReprimand
FineJMD 100,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Complainant, rendered paraplegic in a 2000 motor vehicle accident, retained the Attorney in 2002 to recover damages. An interim order of $3,000,000 was made against Otis Graham, and Dyoll issued a release and discharge for that sum. Dyoll paid $2,336,563.02 to the Attorney, who retained $656,538.90 in fees and paid $1,680,024.12 to the Complainant. Dyoll went into liquidation and no further sums were recovered. The Attorney failed to explain to the Complainant, orally or in writing, the status of his case and implications of Dyoll's insolvency. The Panel found the Attorney guilty of professional misconduct under Canon IV(r) for failing to provide information with due expedition. No dishonesty was found. The Attorney was reprimanded, fined $100,000 to the Complainant, and ordered to pay costs of $20,000 to the Complainant and $15,000 to the General Legal Council.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Attorney knew or ought to have known the Complainant was not fully literate and severely injured (paraplegic), increasing his need for clear communication

Mitigating factors:

  • Attorney had proceeded expeditiously and competently with filing the claim and correspondence with Dyoll
  • Attorney provided a statement of account to the Complainant
  • Complainant expressed no dissatisfaction with funds received and expressly denied any dishonesty by the Attorney

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_costs_amount=35000"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/leslie-roy-campbell-complaint-no-62-of-2017/