Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Melvin Douglas Goldberg

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11464/2016
Date01/01/2016
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 40,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Melvin Douglas Goldberg, a sole practitioner, was found to have committed multiple breaches arising from his involvement in high-value financial transactions, including failing to maintain proper accounts, using his client account as a banking facility, AML failures, conflicts of interest, failing to act in clients' best interests, and acting in transactions bearing hallmarks of money laundering/fraud. The Tribunal found lack of integrity across the transactions but found dishonesty proved only in the later Swiss Garantie transaction, which post-dated an Indemnity Interview and withdrawal of insurance cover, satisfying both the objective and subjective Twinsectra tests. Dishonesty was not proved for the earlier transactions. Given the finding of dishonesty and no exceptional circumstances, the Respondent was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £40,000, not to be enforced without leave of the Tribunal given his bankruptcy and limited means.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty alleged and proved
  • Misconduct deliberate, calculated and repeated
  • Misconduct continued over a period of time
  • Respondent knew or ought to have known conduct breached obligations to protect the public and reputation of the profession
  • Motivation was financial gain and desire to continue acting for Goldmoss
  • Very experienced solicitor in a position of trust
  • Clients (Mr BO and Mr SM) lost significant sums, some unrecovered

Mitigating factors:

  • Long career (nearly 50 years) with no previous disciplinary findings
  • Character references attesting to honesty and good character
  • Expressed regret and apologies for mistakes
  • Extent of dishonesty found fell far short of that alleged
  • No intention to practise again
  • Eventually remedied the suspense account deficit

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11464/