Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Robert John Bradfield Giles

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number6803/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
Dishonesty foundYes

Robert John Bradfield Giles, a sole practitioner, faced allegations of dishonestly/improperly using clients' monies, multiple breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules, and failure to deliver an accountant's report. The Investigation Accountant found a minimum cash shortage of £23,675.95 on client account arising from personal payments, improper transfers, overpayments and withheld funds. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated, expressly finding it dishonest that the respondent used clients' cash to pay office expenses. The Tribunal ordered him struck off the Roll and to pay costs to be taxed if not agreed. Judge Carnwath had earlier declined to make a dishonesty finding on the intervention appeal, leaving it to the Tribunal.The Wait, the schema requires dishonesty_found first. I already set it true. Let me finalize.The Tribunal made an express finding of dishonesty regarding the use of clients' cash to pay office expenses. Sanction: strike off. Costs: to be taxed/agreed, no figure stated.The JSON is complete.</summary>

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Minimum cash shortage of £23,675.95 on client account caused by misuse of clients' funds
  • Used cash held for clients to pay office wages and expenses
  • As sole practitioner failed to supervise handling of clients' money; turned a blind eye
  • Not in a position to replace the shortage at time of inspection

Mitigating factors:

  • No attempt to conceal - cheque stubs and cheques properly annotated
  • Made full admissions except to dishonesty
  • Cooperated and made records available to the Investigation Accountant
  • Problems partly due to elderly cashier's incompetence
  • Expected to receive Legal Aid and private client costs to rectify shortfall
  • No particular financial pressure

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/6803/