Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Peter James Scott

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10551/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 47,514
Dishonesty foundYes

Peter James Scott, sole practitioner of Scott & Company, was found to have made improper withdrawals from client account, failed to carry out reconciliations, failed to account to clients, failed to report serious financial difficulties, carried out reserved work without a practising certificate, misled another solicitor about his status, and re-employed a bookkeeper (SP) subject to a section 43 order without SRA permission. A client account shortfall of at least £601,930.89 arose. The Tribunal found dishonesty proved beyond reasonable doubt in respect of the Ms CR matter (allegations 1.1 and 1.3) and the misleading of Mr B (allegation 1.6), but did not find dishonesty proved regarding the McD transactions (1.1) or the re-employment of SP (1.7). The Respondent was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £47,513.86, not to be enforced without leave of the Tribunal given his financial position.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Substantial client account shortfall of at least £601,930.89
  • Vulnerable clients affected (elderly clients in care, acting under Power of Attorney)
  • Re-employed a bookkeeper who was subject to a section 43 order for prior dishonest misappropriation at his own firm
  • Allowed a conveyancing transaction to complete knowing client account was seriously depleted, taking in £200,000 that would in part disappear
  • Conduct placed the public at serious risk and caused substantial financial loss

Mitigating factors:

  • Self-reported to the SRA
  • Admitted all allegations
  • Good character with no previous disciplinary matters, sole practitioner for 15 years
  • Suffering from severe depression at material time
  • Personal bankruptcy and career ruined; cooperated with police investigation

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10551/