Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Trevor Michael Jones

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8564/2002
Date01/01/2002
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 3,750
Dishonesty foundNo

Trevor Michael Jones, a solicitor admitted in 1972 and senior partner at Addie Jones, admitted all allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor, including taking windfall shares from two estates for his personal benefit, misusing client funds (approximately £17,645.95) to benefit another client and meet a firm liability, giving misleading accounts to clients and the OSS, and causing false entries in the firm's books (minimum cash shortage £20,503.76, since replaced). The Tribunal rejected the argument that the behaviour was aberrational, finding a pattern over 1999-2000 and that he knew his conduct was wrong. Although the term 'dishonest' was not used and the Tribunal made no express dishonesty finding, it found that trust had been destroyed. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £3,750.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Pattern of behaviour over a period of time (mid-1999 to end 2000), not aberrational
  • Respondent was at all times aware that what he was doing was wrong
  • Took and retained windfall shares depriving estate beneficiaries
  • Deliberate use of one client's money for another client or to meet firm's liability
  • Misleading his client and the OSS

Mitigating factors:

  • Long, successful and previously unblemished career (admitted 1972)
  • Prompt full disclosure and restitution once matters came to light
  • Absolved partners and colleagues from blame
  • No financial gain motive; financially secure
  • Considerable pressure of work and personal/marital difficulties
  • Medical evidence and heavy drinking
  • Numerous written testimonials
  • Deep remorse and apologies; had retired and undertook never to return to practice

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8564/