Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Martin Darren Rounthwaite

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12530/2023
Date13/09/2024
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Failures, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 39,460
Dishonesty foundYes

Martin Darren Rounthwaite, a sole practitioner and COLP of Pro-Law Network, faced six allegations all found proved. He failed to pay disbursements totalling over £14,000 despite receiving funds, misusing client monies to pay personal and business expenses including family salaries. He failed to notify the SRA of the Firm's serious financial difficulties, breached undertakings to Spencer Solicitors Ltd, and made inaccurate and misleading statements about a road traffic accident costs claim, falsely asserting costs were unresolved and heading to detailed assessment when they had been agreed and £72,000 paid. The Tribunal found this conduct dishonest under the Ivey test. He also failed to effect an orderly closure of the Firm following his bankruptcy. Not attending, the hearing proceeded in his absence. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay reduced costs of £39,460.30.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty in misleading professional opponent (SSL) through fictitious accounts of ongoing negotiations and detailed assessment
  • Misuse of over £14,000 of client monies for personal and business expenses including family salaries
  • Repeated misconduct over an extended period
  • Failure to engage meaningfully in Tribunal proceedings and non-attendance

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary matters
  • Respondent cited health problems and personal issues during the relevant period
  • Respondent made some admissions during the SRA investigation

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12530/