Decision record
Matthew Philip Berlow (1)
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Law Society alleged professional misconduct against solicitor Matthew Berlow arising from four Facebook posts (comments about a suicide bomber referencing '72 virgins', a comment about Archbishop Desmond Tutu, a spoonerism 'did their cocks go black', and describing the Secondary Complainer as part of the 'anti-semitic brigade'). The Tribunal assessed each post objectively as the ordinary reasonable reader, considered Article 10 freedom of expression, and accepted the Respondent's context. It found the Secondary Complainer vague and lacking credibility and the Respondent credible. None of the four averments of misconduct were established. The Respondent was found not guilty of professional misconduct, the Complaint was dismissed, and expenses were awarded to the Respondent against the Complainers with sanction for Senior Counsel only.
Duties engaged
Documents
Source: https://www.ssdt.org.uk/findings/law-society-v-matthew-philip-berlow-1/