Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Jonathan Martin Gilbert

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10532/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 43,347
Dishonesty foundYes

Jonathan Martin Gilbert, a solicitor and partner at Willmett Solicitors, misused mortgage funds totalling millions received from lender clients (RBS, Birmingham Midshires, Northern Rock, NatWest) for purposes other than the intended property purchases, and failed to comply with an undertaking. He concealed the misuse by falsifying addresses and client details. The firm collapsed facing an insurance shortfall of some £50 million. The Tribunal found all four allegations proved and made an express finding of dishonesty applying the Twinsectra combined test, holding that although no personal benefit was proven, he must have known his conduct was dishonest by ordinary standards. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £43,347.48, not enforceable without leave given his bankruptcy.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Losses to lenders/insurers of around £50 million
  • Firm forced to close and subject to intervention; partners faced bankruptcy
  • Provided false/misleading addresses, plot numbers and client names to conceal misuse of funds from accounts department
  • Written Response was misleading; claimed unevidenced agreement with RBS
  • Described as one of the worst cases before the Tribunal

Mitigating factors:

  • No evidence Respondent personally benefitted from the funds
  • No previous disciplinary sanctions
  • Accepted seriousness and that he would be struck off
  • Personal circumstances: bankrupt, responsible for two young children, reliant on wife's income

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10532/