Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Holly Richmond

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10274/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 39,079
Dishonesty foundNo

Holly Richmond, a sole equity partner at Richmonds Solicitors, faced numerous allegations including accounts rules breaches, misleading fee information, falsely representing fees as disbursements, referral fee failures, supervision failures, non-compliance with Adjudicator directions (notably in the AFPG/AFPG Ltd pension litigation matter where she failed to provide adequate costs information for approximately £1.5m in member contributions), and failing to pay County Court judgments. The SRA expressly did not allege dishonesty. The Tribunal found 11 allegations proved with associated Rule 1/Conduct breaches, though not the conduct issues in respect of allegation H. Considering the seriousness, two prior Tribunal appearances, and the need to protect the public and maintain the profession's reputation, the Tribunal ordered the Respondent be struck off the Roll and pay costs of £39,079.19. The Tribunal also directed that the Adjudicator's directions of 5 November 2008 (sums of £500, £88,082.25 plus VAT, and £840) be treated as enforceable as if made by the High Court.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Two previous appearances before the Tribunal (2004 reprimand and 2007 fine) for Solicitors Accounts Rules breaches
  • Failure of clients kept informed on substantial litigation costs (AFPG matter, approx £1.5m contributions unaccounted)
  • Repeated failures to comply with Adjudicator directions
  • Failures to pay third parties leading to County Court judgments and bankruptcy
  • Considerable damage to reputation of the profession
  • Evasive when giving evidence

Mitigating factors:

  • Ill health (fibromyalgia/post-traumatic stress disorder from June 2005) accepted to have impacted performance to some extent
  • Sudden financial difficulties following collapse of property development and economic downturn
  • Age and permanent disability

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10274/