Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Farooq Rafiq

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12007/2019
Date01/01/2019
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Criminal Convictions, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 55,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Farooq Rafiq, a solicitor and sole director/COLP/COFA of Broadway Solicitors/Broadway Legal Limited, a firm specialising in low-value personal injury claims, admitted numerous allegations including causing/allowing CNFs to be sent without client knowledge or proper grounds, failing to investigate reports of improper claims, failing to advise clients on CMC agreements, acting despite conflicts of interest, instructing financially-connected CMCs for reports/treatments, mishandling overseas outsourcing, multiple Accounts Rules breaches (including a £56,542.11 cash shortage), failing in his COLP/COFA role, and criminal convictions for three assaults (the third committed while on bail). The Tribunal found lack of integrity but made no express finding of dishonesty. It assessed culpability as high and the totality of misconduct at the highest level, ordering the Respondent struck off the Roll and to pay agreed costs of £55,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct continued over a substantial period of time
  • Ought to have known he was in material breach of obligations to protect the public and profession
  • Turned a Nelsonian blind eye to serious issues raised by third parties to protect source of work
  • Third assault committed while already on bail for the first two offences, in breach of court bail conditions
  • Victims of assaults were vulnerable given their domestic status
  • Repeatedly subordinated clients' interests to his own and the Firm's

Mitigating factors:

  • Demonstrated a degree of insight
  • Made a number of early admissions
  • Robustly and properly defended the withdrawn allegations, which included serious matters
  • Evidence of rehabilitation and ongoing treatment for medical issues
  • Positive testimonials as to work, character and rehabilitation
  • Cooperated with the investigation; no attempt to mislead or obstruct
  • No evidence of individual client financial loss

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12007/