The duty in context
Advise objectively, not a mere conduit client
The lawyer must exercise independent forensic and professional judgment for the client's benefit and must not act as a mere mouthpiece or conduit for the client's instructions.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code Principle 3; Principle 7 partial 383 cases
You act: 1.3 with independence. 1.7 in the best interests of each client.
SRA Principles · 2023 · archived copy · official source ↗
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC20; CD4 strong 3 cases
rC20 Where you are a BSB authorised individual, you are personally responsible for your own conduct and for your professional work. You must use your own professional judgment in relation to those matters on which you are instructed and be able to justify your decisions and actions. You must do this notwithstanding the views of your client, professional client, employer or any other person.
BSB Handbook Part 2: Code of Conduct · 5.0 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.6.1(b); P.5 partial
not permit a professional client, a recognised law entity or any other person to limit the attorney-at-law's discretion as to how the interests of the client can best be served
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code of Professional Conduct · 2026 · archived copy
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 17.1 strong 9 cases
A solicitor representing a client in a matter that is before the court must not act as the mere mouthpiece of the client or of the instructing solicitor (if any) and must exercise the forensic judgments called for during the case independently, after the appropriate consideration of the client's and the instructing solicitor's instructions where applicable.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules r41 strong 4 cases
A barrister must not act as the mere mouthpiece of the client or of the instructing solicitor and must exercise the forensic judgments called for during the case independently, after the appropriate consideration of the client's and the instructing solicitor's wishes where practicable.
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules · 2015 (as amended 14 May 2025) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch1 — The function of the solicitor in society; Ch6 — Litigation: initiating letters and correspondence strong 2 cases
Barron J set out the obligation of the solicitor in Doran v Delaney... as follows: "The solicitor is not a conduit pipe."... A solicitor is not a mere conduit for their client's instructions and should not purport to represent their clients' instructions as facts.
Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct (Law Society of Ireland) · 4th ed. (2022) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 5.15 strong 2 cases
A barrister when conducting proceedings in Court is responsible for the conduct and presentation of his case, and must exercise the independent judgment called for during the case. A barrister must not act as a mere spokesperson for the client or the instructing solicitor.
Code of Conduct for the Bar of Ireland · 2024 · archived copy · official source ↗
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon IV(c) strong 3 cases
An Attorney shall exercise independent judgment within the bounds of the law and the ethics of the profession for the benefit of his client.
Legal Profession (Canons of Professional Ethics) Rules · 1978 (principal) · archived copy · official source ↗
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.5.1 d); P.5 strong
Members must: ... d) not permit their professional client, firm or any other person to limit their discretion as to how the interests of the client can best be served.
Law Society of Jersey Code of Conduct · 1 January 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.2-2 commentary [2] strong
The lawyer's duty to the client who seeks legal advice is to give the client a competent opinion based on a sufficient knowledge of the relevant facts, an adequate consideration of the applicable law, and the lawyer's own experience and expertise. The advice must be open and undisguised and must clearly disclose what the lawyer honestly thinks about the merits and probable results.
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.1-3(a) strong 4 cases
A lawyer should obtain sufficient knowledge of the relevant facts and give adequate consideration to the applicable law before advising a client, and give an open and undisguised opinion of the merits and probable results of the client's cause. The lawyer should be wary of bold and confident assurances to the client, especially where the lawyer's employment may depend on such assurances.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 5.3 strong
A lawyer must at all times exercise independent professional judgement on a client's behalf. A lawyer must give objective advice to the client based on the lawyer's understanding of the law.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.3 partial 1 case
You must give independent advice free from external influences or personal interests which are inconsistent with these standards.
Law Society of Scotland — Practice Rules 2011, Rule B1 (Standards of Conduct) · 2011 · archived copy · official source ↗
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 no clear equivalent
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 5.18 / Principle 5.19 strong
A solicitor must be both honest and candid when advising a client and give objective advice. ... A solicitor's advice must be unbiased and not be influenced by whether his employment or other work may depend upon advising in a particular way.
Hong Kong Solicitors' Guide to Professional Conduct (Volume 1) · current · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.17(a) strong
A practising barrister must, however, not act as the mere mouthpiece of the client or the instructing person and must exercise the professional judgments called for during the case independently, after appropriate consideration of the client's and the instructing person's wishes where practicable.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
408 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
Nicholas Nikola Stojanovic
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019
-
Zeeshan Saqib Mian
Breaches, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011
-
John William Cruickshank
Account Rules breaches, Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019
-
Gordon Mcpherson Keir
Account Rules breaches, Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Pr…
-
Elizabeth Forrest
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Simon Langford
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019
-
Shezhad Ilyas
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019
-
-
Mark Feely
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011
-
Grenville Royston Young
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019
-
Shashi Patel
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, …
-
Anjum Shahzad
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019
-
Richard Alexander Dobson
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019
-
Sarinjit Singh Bahia
Account Rules breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, S…
-
Mohamed Faisal Mamon
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Indemnity Insurance Rules, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019
-
Vipul Kapoor
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Anthony Burns
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Maame Adjoa Djan-Krofa
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019
-
Alexander William Bruce Lee
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011
-
Nicholas Devlin
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019
-
Christopher Yiannakas; Nicholas George Kephalas; YVA Solicitors LLP
Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019
-
Gboyega Ajibola Okunniga
Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Darren Hanison
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Shafiq-ul Hassan
Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019
-
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.