Sean O’Neil Kinghorn
Allegation / charges
Dismissed, Costs | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 26, 2009. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT No. 117 of 2007 BETWEEN EARL BIGGS COMPLAINANT AND SEAN KINGHORN RESPONDENT PANEL:ALLAN S. WOOD LILIETH DEACON …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Complaint of inexcusable/deplorable negligence under Canon IV(s) against attorney Sean Kinghorn for allegedly suppressing documents in matrimonial property proceedings. The Panel found the Complainant unreliable and untruthful, noting his own affidavits undermined his case and that he had rejected a generous equal-division settlement against the Respondent's advice. The Panel declined to find deplorable or inexcusable neglect and refused compensation. However, it found the Respondent breached Canons I(e) and I(f) by failing to respond to the complaint and failing to attend the hearings, and ordered him to pay JMD $20,000 in costs to the General Legal Council. No dishonesty was found.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Failed to attend hearings on both dates without explanation despite proper service
- Provided no defence or information, causing delay and waste of the Committee's time
Mitigating factors:
- The Complainant was found to be an unreliable and untruthful witness
- The Complainant rejected a favourable 50% settlement offer against the Respondent's advice
- Complainant was largely the author of his own misfortune
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/sean-o-neil-kinghorn-complaint-no-117-of-2007/