Skip to main content
discipline 1 October 2026

The duty in context

Personal probity and fitness to practise integrity

The lawyer must remain a fit and proper person to practise and must not engage in conduct, in or out of practice, demonstrating they are unfit.

1,235 cases 64% strike-off avg suspension 28.3 mo avg fine 4,333 34 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code Principle 2; CCS Introduction partial 874 cases
Conduct does not need to take place in a workplace in order to relate to your practice - these requirements capture conduct which touches realistically upon your practice of the profession ... 1.2 in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook CD5; gC25; gC27 strong 85 cases
CD5 You must not behave in a way which is likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in you or in the profession. gC25 ... conduct which is likely to be treated as a breach of CD3 and/or CD5 includes ... .3 criminal conduct, other than minor criminal offences (see Guidance C27); ... .5 dishonesty;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 P.2; R.3.1 partial
Attorneys-at-law shall not, in their professional and personal lives, act in any way which brings or which may reasonably bring the legal profession or the provision of legal services in the Cayman Islands into disrepute.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 5.1.1 strong 156 cases
A solicitor must not engage in conduct, in the course of legal practice or otherwise, which: 5.1.1 demonstrates that the solicitor is not a fit and proper person to practise law.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr12(a),13 strong 51 cases
A barrister must not engage in conduct which is: (a) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister ... A barrister must not engage in another vocation which: (a) is liable to adversely affect the reputation of the legal profession or the barrister's own reputation.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch6 — Professional standard of conduct strong 7 cases
A solicitor, whether in their professional capacity or otherwise, must not engage in any conduct that is fraudulent, deceitful, or in any way contrary to their position as a solicitor and as an officer of the court.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 2.3(c); Rule 2.12 strong 7 cases
not to engage in conduct (whether in pursuit of their profession or otherwise) which may bring the Barristers' profession into disrepute, which may injure the dignity and high standing of the profession, or which is likely to diminish the trust and confidence placed in them or in the profession;
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon III(k); Canon I(b) strong 70 cases
Where an Attorney commits any criminal offence which in the opinion of the Disciplinary Committee is of a nature likely to bring the profession into disrepute, such commission of the offence shall constitute misconduct in a professional respect ... [I(b)] An Attorney shall at all times maintain the honour and dignity of the profession and shall abstain from behaviour which may tend to discredit the profession.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code P.2; GP.6 strong
Members must not, in their professional and personal lives, act in any way which brings or which may fairly bring the legal profession or the provision of legal services in Jersey into disrepute... Disgraceful conduct (including conviction of any criminal offence, other than a minor traffic offence) outside a member's practice may place them in breach of P.2.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 2.1-1 commentary [3] strong
Dishonourable or questionable conduct on the part of a lawyer in either private life or professional practice will reflect adversely upon the integrity of the profession and the administration of justice. Whether within or outside the professional sphere, if the conduct is such that knowledge of it would be likely to impair a client's trust in the lawyer, the Law Society may be justified in taking disciplinary action.
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.2-1, commentary [3] strong 2 cases
Dishonourable or questionable conduct on the part of a lawyer in either private life or professional practice will reflect adversely upon the integrity of the profession and the administration of justice. Whether within or outside the professional sphere, if the conduct is such that knowledge of it would be likely to impair a client's trust in the lawyer, the Society may be justified in taking disciplinary action.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 1.4 strong
The kinds of conduct ... for which a lawyer ... may be disciplined are as follows: ... (c) negligence or incompetence ... so frequent as to reflect on the lawyer's fitness to practise ...; (d) conviction of an offence punishable by imprisonment where the conviction reflects on the lawyer's fitness to practise, or tends to bring the legal profession into disrepute.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.2 partial 4 cases
You must be trustworthy and act honestly at all times so that your personal integrity is beyond question.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 4(c) partial 16 cases
A legal practitioner has a duty to discharge honourably and with integrity all of the legal practitioner’s responsibilities to any tribunal before which the legal practitioner appears, the legal practitioner’s clients, the public and other members of the legal profession.
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 1.03 Commentary strong
As an Officer of the Court, proper standards of behaviour whether in his practice or in his independent business activities are required of a solicitor as a member of an honourable profession.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 4.1(b) strong
not to engage in conduct (whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise) which is:- (i) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister; (ii) likely to bring the profession of barrister into disrepute or otherwise diminish public confidence in the profession of barrister;

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

1,235 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Michael Griffiths
    BTAS barrister Middle Temple 2026-06-15 rule cited
    strike_off open to appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Paul Wynell-Sutherland
    BTAS barrister Inner Temple 2026-06-12 rule cited
    strike_off open to appeal 2 PDFs View decision
  • Raymond John McKeeve
    SDT solicitor 12736/2025 2026-06-08 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Johanna Morris
    BTAS barrister Middle Temple 2026-05-29 rule cited
    reprimand open to appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Jonathan Lea
    SDT solicitor 12845/2025 2026-05-21 rule cited

    SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspended period of Suspension 1 PDF View decision
  • John Kishin Navani
    SDT solicitor 12555/2024 2026-05-21 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Mandeep Sunny Singh Thandi
    SDT solicitor 12782/2025 2026-05-19 rule cited

    Breaches, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mohamed Faisal Mamon
    SDT solicitor 12831/2025 2026-05-19 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Indemnity Insurance Rules, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Louisa Frances Clapton
    SDT solicitor 12873/2025 2026-05-19 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Shukur, Mohammed
    OLSC solicitor 2026-05-14 text match

    Not a fit and proper person to hold an Australian practising certificate

    Refusal to renew practising certificate pursuant to ss 44, 45 and 464 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), for the practising year ending 30 June 2026 $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Lewis, Sarah Kate
    OLSC solicitor 2026-05-14 text match

    Council is not satisfied that the Australian Lawyer is currently able to carry out satisfactorily the inherent requirements of practice as an Australian legal practitioner — Not a fit and proper person to hold a practis…

    Refusal of grant of practising certificate pursuant to ss 45 and 464 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), for the practise year ending 30 June 2026 $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Riffat Hussain
    SDT solicitor 12784/2025 2026-05-12 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Not Proved/Dismissed 1 PDF View decision
  • Vipul Kapoor
    SDT solicitor 12793/2025 2026-05-12 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Robert Mannering Sedgwick
    SDT solicitor 12806/2025 2026-05-12 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mohammed Alias Yousef
    SDT solicitor 12757/2025 2026-05-06 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Reprimand 1 PDF View decision
  • Anthony Burns
    SDT solicitor 12677/2024 2026-05-06 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Joseph Elliot Dawson
    SDT solicitor 12778/2025 2026-05-06 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Maame Adjoa Djan-Krofa
    SDT solicitor 12771/2025 2026-04-30 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspended period of Suspension 1 PDF View decision
  • Jack Anthony Medlicott
    SDT solicitor 12768/2025 2026-04-28 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Alexander William Bruce Lee
    SDT solicitor 12813/2025 2026-04-28 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Chinwe Uzo Chikwendu; Undiga Emuekpere
    SDT solicitor 12521/2023 2026-04-27 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Reprimand, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Davina Charlton
    SDT solicitor 12676/2024 2026-04-23 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Not Proved/Dismissed 1 PDF View decision
  • Eaton, John Anthony
    OLSC solicitor 2026-04-22 text match

    Engaged in legal practice without a practising certificate during the period October to November 2025 Engaged in unsupervised legal practice and without professional indemnity insurance Failed to disclose relevant matte…

    Refusal of grant of practising certificate for the period 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026 pursuant to s 45 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) (Uniform Law) $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Bhatia, Ehman
    OLSC solicitor Arise Law Group Pty Ltd t/a Bhatia Legal 2026-04-22 text match

    Not a fit and proper person to hold a practising certificate

    Refusal of the Solicitor’s Application for the Renewal of his Practising Certificate pursuant to s 45 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) for the period 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026. $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Nicholas Devlin
    SDT solicitor 12862/2025 2026-04-20 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.