Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Tolhurst Fisher LLP

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12720/2025
Date16/05/2025
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2007, Code of Conduct 2011, Money Laundering Regulations, SRA Principles 2011

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 120,000
CostsGBP 25,290
Dishonesty foundNo

Tolhurst Fisher LLP, a long-established firm doing significant conveyancing work, admitted six allegations of failing to comply with anti-money laundering requirements (MLRs 2007 and 2017) over a period exceeding 15 years, including failures to have a firm wide risk assessment, adequate policies/controls/procedures, client and matter risk assessments, and source of funds inquiries on two specific files. The matter was resolved on the papers via an agreed outcome. No dishonesty was alleged or found. The Tribunal categorised the misconduct as very serious (Level 4), noting no evidence of actual harm but significant risk to the reputation of the profession, and imposed a fine of £120,000 plus costs of £25,290.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct continued over a lengthy period (over 15 years) involving repeated failures across management and staff
  • Firm knew or ought reasonably to have known its conduct was in material breach of obligations
  • Well-established firm of size and resources undertaking significant conveyancing (higher risk sector)
  • High level of culpability with direct control over relevant matters
  • Periods where firm had no safeguards at all

Mitigating factors:

  • Full cooperation with the SRA investigation
  • Full and frank admissions at an early stage, avoiding a contested hearing
  • Active steps taken to remedy the breaches
  • Previously unblemished regulatory record
  • No evidence of actual harm caused

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12720/