Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

CHARLENE SHEILA AMSDEN

JurisdictionAustralia — Western Australia
BodyLegal Practice Board of Western Australia (LPBWA)
Professionlawyer — PO Box 3440 NEDLANDS WA 6005
Case numberLegal Profession Complaints Committee v Amsden [2014] WASAT 57 and [2014] WASAT 57 (S)
Date22 May 2014 and 29 July 2014
HearingState Administrative Tribunal
OutcomeProfessional Misconduct

Allegation / charges

Professional Misconduct

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineAUD 5,000
CostsAUD 20,339
Dishonesty foundNo

Charlene Sheila Amsden, an experienced criminal lawyer, owned two of three units in a strata complex and managed the strata company. She incurred legal fees seeking removal of an air conditioner installed by the owners of the third unit (Mr A and Ms A). She then demanded $2,022 from them and commenced a minor case claim in the Magistrates Court for that amount, despite them having no existing liability and there being no cause of action, making the proceeding an abuse of process. The SAT found this constituted professional misconduct - conduct reasonably regarded as disgraceful or dishonourable and breaching rr 6(2)(b), 6(2)(c), 16(1) and 18(1) of the Conduct Rules. Her defences (personal capacity, honest mistake of law, lack of experience) were rejected. Dishonesty was not alleged and no express finding of dishonesty was made; the Committee's request for an incidental finding of misleading conduct was declined. On penalty, the Tribunal reprimanded her and imposed a $5,000 fine plus costs of $20,339.40.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Complete lack of insight into wrongdoing
  • No remorse or contrition; no apology to Mr A and Ms A
  • Conduct intended to apply inappropriate and improper pressure to pay
  • Grossly unfair to the other owners and wasted valuable court time and resources
  • Persisted in defending and reagitating misconceived and scandalous arguments

Mitigating factors:

  • No prior disciplinary record over a legal career of almost 30 years
  • Positive contributions to the legal profession (lectures, committees, duty lawyer, mentoring)
  • Positive contributions to the community (Official Visitors to mental health facilities, hospital Ethics Committee)
  • Career focused on representing disadvantaged people, at times without fee

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.lpbwa.org.au/getmedia/e88f5464-6f25-45e2-b150-f9c594dd81c1/register_of_disciplinary_action.pdf