Neelash Mehta

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

Neelash Mehta, a construction law solicitor, faced five allegations. He admitted two drink-driving convictions (2016 and 2018) and driving whilst disqualified on at least four occasions. He denied but was found to have made false declarations on two expenses/mileage claim forms at Ashfords confirming he held a valid licence and insurance when disqualified, and to have misrepresented to Keystone Law that he had no criminal convictions and was not subject to firm or SRA investigation. The Tribunal made express findings of dishonesty on allegations 1.4 and 1.5. Finding the misconduct serious and involving dishonesty with no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered agreed costs of £27,000.

Duties found breached:

• Proper basis for allegations
• Not mislead third parties or opponents
• No conflict between current clients

Aggravating factors:

• Dishonesty which was deliberate, calculated and repeated
• Sought to conceal wrongdoing by placing blame on others (Ms Reason)
• Gave untrue evidence to protect his own position
• Motivated by self-preservation to maintain reputation and income
• Conduct was planned
• Repeated disregard for court order created significant risk of harm to colleagues and other road users
• Very experienced solicitor with sole and direct control

Mitigating factors:

• Self-reported the matters
• Previously unblemished record
• Showed insight regarding allegations 1.1-1.3
• Overcame alcohol issues that led to offending
• Positive testimonials
• Personal circumstances including young children