Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Michael Brendan O'Maoileoin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11702/2017
Date01/01/2017
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 7,392
Dishonesty foundYes

The Respondent, an experienced solicitor at Hugh James, failed to diarise and attend a summary judgment hearing, then concealed his error. He provided a witness statement dated 24 March 2015 to Genus Law for High Court proceedings which he knew contained false and misleading information (claiming documents were misfiled and only came to his attention after the winding-up petition). He admitted breaches of Principles 2 and 6 and failure to achieve Outcome 5.1, and expressly admitted dishonesty. The Tribunal found the dishonesty proved and found no exceptional circumstances (rejecting arguments about work pressures, delay by the SRA, and character references). The Respondent was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £7,391.50.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate dishonesty sustained over a period of about 7 months
  • Misleading the court via a false witness statement bearing a statement of truth (effectively perjury)
  • Respondent was a highly experienced solicitor in a supportive environment
  • Multiple missed opportunities to correct the falsehood
  • Conduct done to protect his own professional reputation
  • Betrayal of trust as an officer of the court, exposing client and firm to risk

Mitigating factors:

  • Previously unblemished record
  • Admitted the allegations including dishonesty
  • Offered a meaningful apology and demonstrated insight
  • Strong character references spanning his career
  • Eventually made a clean breast to employers and matter was rectified within about a month

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11702/