Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Michael Peter Goodwin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12726/2025
Date29/08/2025
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension12 months
CostsGBP 12,500
Dishonesty foundYes

Michael Peter Goodwin, a solicitor admitted in 2021 working in residential property at Talbots Law, altered an email address within a forwarded email thread on 18 July 2023 to give the impression that an earlier email had been sent to the client's correct address when it had gone to the wrong one. The matter was self-reported by both the firm and the Respondent. He admitted breaching Principles 2, 4 and 5 and Paragraph 1.4, and admitted dishonesty. The Tribunal, dealing with the matter by agreed outcome, found the dishonesty was momentary, confined to one email address change, caused no client harm, and involved no client funds. Considering the Respondent's mental health difficulties as a secondary factor, the Tribunal found exceptional circumstances existed and imposed a 12-month suspension rather than strike-off, plus costs of £12,500. Applications for anonymity were refused by majority; the hearing was held in private on medical grounds.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Respondent knew his conduct was in material breach of his obligations to protect the reputation of the legal profession
  • Failed to correct the misleading impression, with opportunities to do so before disclosing to employer on 3 October 2023

Mitigating factors:

  • No loss or detriment to the client and transaction unaffected
  • Self-reported the matter to the SRA
  • Single, momentary episode (few seconds) in a previously unblemished career
  • Demonstrated insight and remorse
  • Made open and frank admissions to employer and SRA
  • Fully co-operated with the SRA
  • Mental health issues and personal strain (terminal illness of partner's mother) contributing to impulsive decision-making

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12726/