Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

James Nicholas Roberts

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number8666/2002
Date01/01/2002
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

James Nicholas Roberts, a solicitor admitted in 1980, faced allegations including accounts breaches, a client account shortage of £27,782.06, taking $7,500 costs from a client without consent, and knowingly assisting the directors of struck-off company CLC Limited to continue trading and avoid a winding up petition. The Tribunal rejected his Article 6 delay/human rights preliminary application. Applying Royal Brunei v Tan and Twinsectra v Yardley, the Tribunal found the Respondent acted dishonestly regarding CLC Limited (allegations 5-8), and found the remaining uncontested allegations substantiated. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs subject to detailed assessment.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonest conduct in relation to CLC Limited
  • Knowingly assisted a struck-off company to trade and avoid creditors
  • Company had been struck off the Register twice before to Respondent's knowledge
  • Payments diverted to director's personal account frustrating creditors

Mitigating factors:

  • No personal financial gain from the CLC scheme
  • Naivety and weakness rather than intention to gain
  • Former partner had undertaken most administrative and banking work
  • Difficult financial circumstances and deteriorating partnership relationship
  • Brought books of account up to date after intervention
  • Successor firm able to account to all clients
  • Loss of job, practice, profession, home and good name; made bankrupt
  • Appeared before the Tribunal and expressed remorse

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/8666/