Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Barrie Christopher Jackson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9183/2005
Date01/01/2005
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 7,995
Dishonesty foundYes

Barrie Christopher Jackson, a sole practitioner solicitor, faced four allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor. He admitted failing to keep proper accounting records, making improper withdrawals from client account, and failing to comply with a witness summons. He contested the allegation of dishonest use of clients' funds. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated, including expressly finding dishonesty under the Twinsectra test - concluding that his repeated use of client account cheques (seventeen times over eight months) for office expenses and unallocated round sum transfers to reduce his office overdraft were deliberate and dishonest. Despite sympathy for his considerable personal difficulties, the Tribunal ordered him struck off the Roll and to pay costs of £7,994.94.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate course of action - seventeen client account cheques signed to meet office expenditure over eight months
  • Round sum transfers from client to office account made to reduce office overdraft
  • Use of a bankers draft drawn on client account money
  • Minimum cash shortage of £92,586.86 identified

Mitigating factors:

  • Considerable personal difficulties and pressures (deaths of parents, divorce, custody battles, ill health of family)
  • Difficulties in recruiting and retaining competent bookkeepers
  • No complaints from clients and no claims on Compensation Fund
  • Made attempts to bring books up to date
  • Rectified the identified shortfall from his own funds
  • Positive testimonials as to probity and competence
  • Ten years of prior practice without problems

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9183/