Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Jillian Susan Blake

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9405/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 4,012
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole practitioner Jillian Susan Blake never kept client account books or ledgers since opening a client account in 1988, failed to file Accountant's Reports for years ending 1989/1990 to 2003, and repeatedly and deliberately stated on Practising Certificate applications that she did not hold client monies when she did, in order to avoid regulatory requirements. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated (uncontested) and made an express finding of calculated, deliberate dishonesty over a protracted period. Despite mitigation (no client losses, cooperation, remorse), she was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £4,011.89.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty committed over a protracted period
  • Conduct went to the heart of her practice and left clients' money essentially unprotected
  • Calculated and deliberate deception, confirmed by handwritten letter of 15 December 1999 reversing a locum's correct completion of the form
  • Repeated misrepresentation across as many as 12 application forms plus correspondence
  • Made false statements to her regulatory body to avoid regulatory requirements

Mitigating factors:

  • No misappropriation of client money and no client lost any money
  • No complaints from the public
  • No previous appearance before the Tribunal
  • Eventually owned up and disclosed she held client money
  • Full cooperation with the Law Society investigation
  • Repayment to the Compensation Fund and arranging drawing up of accounts
  • Genuine remorse and positive references

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9405/