Decision record
Calvin Benjamin Rose
Appeals and appellate references
- Appellate document — relationship to this matter unverified: Gresford Jones v The General Legal Council (ex parte Owen Ferron) Miscellaneous Appeal No. 22/2002 delivered March 18, 2005
“Unverified” means the upstream page linked an appellate judgment but did not preserve enough context to prove that it was an appeal in this matter.
Allegation / charges
Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 30, 2022. || Suspended, Fined | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 04, 2023. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 226/2018 IN …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council heard a complaint against Attorney Calvin Rose, who was named sole executor and a beneficiary under a 2017 will of Olive Pascoe, whom he had represented. The Committee did not accept beyond reasonable doubt that the will was forged. However, it found that, as a fiduciary, the Attorney accepted a substantial gift (property valued at $9.5M) without advising the client to obtain independent legal advice and insisting on it, thereby breaching his fiduciary duty and allowing his professional duties to conflict with his personal interest. It also found he gave false information on the Deceased's death certificate (describing himself as her son), contravening the Perjury Act, which was used to obtain probate, and that he failed to account for probate fees. He was found guilty of professional misconduct in breach of Canon 1(b) and conflict of interest. The Committee deferred sanction, inviting submissions. No express finding of dishonesty was made.
Duties found breached:
- Cease acting on client perjury or disobedience
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No own-interest conflict
- Account for interest on client money
Aggravating factors:
- The gift to the Attorney was substantial (property valued at $9,500,000) and he was a stranger to the Deceased, met only the year before
- The false death certificate describing him as 'son' was used to obtain the grant of probate
- No written record or trust document to support his claim that he would decline the gift
Mitigating factors:
- The Attorney provided care, food and paid medical and funeral expenses for the Deceased from personal funds
- He eventually provided a statement of account (dated 10 January 2019)
- The death certificate was later amended (22 October 2019) to reflect his status as Executor
- The Committee did not find the 2017 Will to be a forgery
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/calvin-benjamin-rose-complaint-no-226-of-2018/