Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Clive Leslie Billington

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11879/2018
Date01/01/2018
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 2,500
Dishonesty foundYes

Clive Leslie Billington, a sole practitioner solicitor admitted in 1987, admitted five allegations of misconduct arising from conveyancing transactions on the leasehold and freehold of a property in Preston involving lender client Barclays. He failed to disclose a sub-sale, the true source of completion funds, and the discrepancy between the £315,000 mortgage advance and the sums actually applied; acted in a conflict of interest for both buyer and seller; acted in transactions bearing the hallmarks of mortgage fraud; and breached an undertaking to Barclays. He admitted all allegations including dishonesty (Ivey test). The Tribunal approved an Agreed Outcome, finding the dishonesty over a long period so serious that, with no exceptional circumstances, the Respondent was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £2,500.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct involving dishonesty over a relatively long period of time
  • Experienced solicitor with over 25 years' post-qualification experience at the material time
  • High harm - lender client lost funds
  • Harm to the reputation of the profession
  • Previous appearance before the Tribunal in April 2012 (fine of £25,000 and costs of £17,500) contradicting claim of unblemished career

Mitigating factors:

  • Admitted all allegations in full including dishonesty, avoiding a trial
  • Full cooperation with the SRA and indemnity insurers
  • No personal gain beyond modest conveyancing fees
  • Made good the loss by paying Barclays out of his own limited funds (settled claim, sold property, paid over £140,000)
  • Genuine subjective belief that Barclays knew about the structure of the transaction
  • Delay - matters dating back over 11 years hanging over him
  • Contrition, apology and profound personal and health impact
  • Conduct predated his 2012 Tribunal appearance

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11879/