Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Liaqat Ali

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12659/2024
Date16/05/2025
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Failures, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 30,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Liaqat Ali, owner and director of BK Solicitors Limited, was found to have participated in or facilitated the receipt and onward transfer of over £1.1 million through BK's client account some 20 months after the firm had closed, in circumstances bearing the hallmarks of fraud or other illegality (Allegation 1.1). He also provided false and misleading information to the SRA in interviews on 21 June and 6 July 2022 (Allegation 1.2), and failed to effect an orderly closure of BK in a timely manner (Allegation 1.3). The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including express findings of dishonesty under the Ivey test on Allegations 1.1 and 1.2. Preliminary applications for an adjournment and to admit late, non-compliant expert medical evidence were refused. Finding no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck the Respondent off the Roll and ordered him to pay costs of £30,000 (reduced from £33,603 for duplication).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Finding of dishonesty
  • Respondent's level of experience (13 years) and senior position as director, owner, COLP and COFA
  • Should have known conduct was a material breach of professional obligations
  • Provided false and misleading information to regulator during investigation

Mitigating factors:

  • Previously unblemished career with no prior disciplinary findings

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • 9333/2005 2005-01-01 · SDT · England & Wales · S.43 Order (clerks)

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12659/