Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026

The duty in context

No improper solicitation or touting profession

The lawyer must not solicit business through unsolicited approaches, visits or calls to the public, or by touting in a manner likely to bring the profession into disrepute.

239 cases 70% strike-off avg suspension 23.3 mo avg fine 17,641 117 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 8.9 strong 191 cases
8.9 You do not make unsolicited approaches to members of the public, with the exception of current or former clients, in order to advertise legal services provided by you, or your business or employer.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC14 partial
rC14 If you solicit work in any jurisdiction outside England and Wales, you must not do so in a manner which would be prohibited if you were a member of the local Bar.
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.12.4 strong
An attorney-at-law's practice shall not be publicised in the Cayman Islands by means of unsolicited visits or telephone calls to members of the public.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 34.2 partial 29 cases
In the conduct or promotion of a solicitor's practice, the solicitor must not seek instructions for the provision of legal services in a manner likely to oppress or harass a person who, by reason of some recent trauma or injury, or other circumstances, is, or might reasonably be expected to be, at a significant disadvantage in dealing with the solicitor at the time when the instructions are sought.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch9 — Touting strong 5 cases
A solicitor should not make a direct uninvited approach to any person with a view to being instructed to provide legal services, where this approach is likely to bring the solicitors' profession into disrepute. Approaches should not be made an inappropriate locations.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 6.5(b) partial 5 cases
Barristers speaking or writing as permitted by paragraph 6.3 above shall not: ... (b) Directly or indirectly suggest that any client or class of client were advised to employ them;
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon II(b); Canon II(c); Canon II(d) strong 5 cases
An Attorney shall not in the carrying on of his practice or otherwise permit any act or thing which is likely or is intended to attract business unfairly or can reasonably be regarded as touting or advertising. (c) An Attorney shall not endeavour by direct or indirect means to attract the clients of his fellow Attorneys.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.8.4 strong
A member's practice must not be publicised in Jersey by means of unsolicited visits or telephone calls to a member of the public. A member of the public does not include current or former clients, existing or former business or professional connections or other members or other commercial organisations.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 4.1-2 strong
In offering legal services, a lawyer shall not use means that (a) are false or misleading; (b) amount to coercion, duress, or harassment; (c) take advantage of a person who is vulnerable or who has suffered a traumatic experience and has not yet had a chance to recover; (d) are intended to influence a person who has retained another lawyer or paralegal for a particular matter to change that representative for that matter, unless the change is initiated by the person or that representative; or (e) otherwise bring the profession or the administration of justice into disrepute.
BC Lawyers BC Code r 4.2-5, commentary [1] partial 2 cases
For example, a marketing activity violates this rule if it: (a) is calculated or likely to take advantage of the vulnerability, either physical or emotional, of the recipient, ... (c) otherwise brings the administration of justice into disrepute.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 10.10 strong
A lawyer must not directly contact a prospective client— (a) in a way that is intrusive, offensive, or inappropriate; or (b) if the lawyer knows or should know that the physical, emotional, or mental state of the person is such that the person could not exercise reasonable judgement in engaging a lawyer, or the lawyer is aware that the prospective client does not wish to be contacted by the lawyer.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 39 (Touting and referrals) strong
39 Touting and referrals
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 3.03 strong
A solicitor must not obtain business by improper means. ... Improper means can include ... obtaining business by touting (in contravention to the Solicitors' Practice Promotion Code), undue influence, arrangement to share fees or proceeds of litigation with unqualified persons.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 8.1(b)(vi)-(viii) strong
Advertising or promotion must not:- (vi) be intrusive, offensive or otherwise inappropriate having regard to the manner, medium, frequency of approach or surrounding circumstances; ... (viii) take place in or in the immediate vicinity of a hospital or similar medical establishment, court, tribunal, police station or place of detention;

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

239 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Mark Victor Michie
    SSDT solicitor Mark Victor Michie, 25 Rosebery Street, Aberdeen 2011-03-09 found breached
    strike_off Appeal Concluded 1 PDF View decision
  • Gauri Advani
    SDT solicitor 10865/2011 2011-01-01 found breached

    Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Nasir Ilyas
    SDT solicitor 10840/2011 2011-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • D E Powell// D J Corlis/Another
    SDT solicitor 10694/2011 2011-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Strike off, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael J Murphy
    LSI solicitor MJ Murphy & Co, Solicitors, 25 Lower Salthill, Galway, Co Galway 2010-06-14 text match

    In the matter of Michael J Murphy, a solicitor formerly practising as MJ Murphy & Co, Solicitors, 25 Lower Salthill, Galway, Co Galway, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [4803/DT119/08 and High Court re…

    strike_off View decision
  • Stuart Gemmell McPhail & Another
    SDT solicitor 10624/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Reprimand, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Lennox Andrew Manifold
    SDT solicitor 10611/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Aygun Sahin
    SDT solicitor 10641/2010 2010-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • John Athuahene and Richard Thomas Thorburn
    SSDT solicitor John Atuahene, Solicitor, formerly of 72 Hawkshead Road, Paisley and now at 6A Gallowhill Court, Paisley and Richard Thomas Thorburn, Solicitor, formerly of Thornhome House, By Carluke and now at 0/1 110 Lancefield Quay, Glasow 2009-11-24 found breached
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Ciaran R Callan
    LSI solicitor Callan & Company, Solicitors, River Bank House, Dodder Park Drive, Dublin 14 2009-07-13 found breached

    In the matter of Ciaran R Callan, a solicitor formerly practising as Callan & Company, Solicitors, River Bank House, Dodder Park Drive, Dublin 14, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2008 [4316/DT13/08 and Hig…

    strike_off View decision
  • Norman James Cowie
    SSDT solicitor Norman James Cowie, Solicitor, formerly of Cowie & Co., 198 High Street, Cowdenbeath, Fife and now of 36 Crawford Gardens, St. Andrews, Fife 2009-02-26 found breached
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • O M O Ijaola
    SDT solicitor 10380/2009 2009-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • A K Kaihiva
    SDT solicitor 10199/2009 2009-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • JOSEPHINE PEPE
    LPBWA lawyer Level 1, 533 Hay Street PERTH WA 6000 Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee v Pepe [2008] WASAT 246 2008-09-26 found breached

    Unsatisfactory Conduct by reason of Illegal Conduct

    Unsatisfactory Conduct by reason of Illegal Conduct 1 PDF View decision
  • A J Nulty & Another
    SDT solicitor 9871/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Others

    Fine, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Colin D Poole
    SDT solicitor 10129/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Fine, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Fleur Cranage
    SDT solicitor 10070/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Others

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Janet Lefton
    SDT solicitor 9902/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Criminal Convictions, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Sean Colin Garner
    SDT solicitor 10081/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • S Dhama & Others
    SDT solicitor 10018/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Delays, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Costs only, Fine, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Martin Andrew Conroy
    SDT solicitor 10117/2008 2008-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • NINO DE PARDO
    LPBWA lawyer The Old Swan Brewery 173 Mounts Bay Road CRAWLEY WA 6009 Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee v De Pardo [2007] WASAT 211 2007-08-24 found breached

    Illegal and Unsatisfactory Conduct and Suspended

    Illegal and Unsatisfactory Conduct and Suspended 1 PDF View decision
  • Judith Ihekerenma Nwokoro
    SDT solicitor 9772/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

    Suspend - Indefinite 1 PDF View decision
  • Priya Prashar
    SDT solicitor 9810/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Ian Muir Jewell
    SDT solicitor 9779/2007 2007-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Others

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.