Skip to main content
discipline 30 September 2026

The duty in context

Personal probity and fitness to practise integrity

The lawyer must remain a fit and proper person to practise and must not engage in conduct, in or out of practice, demonstrating they are unfit.

1,235 cases 64% strike-off avg suspension 28.3 mo avg fine 4,333 34 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code Principle 2; CCS Introduction partial 874 cases
Conduct does not need to take place in a workplace in order to relate to your practice - these requirements capture conduct which touches realistically upon your practice of the profession ... 1.2 in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook CD5; gC25; gC27 strong 85 cases
CD5 You must not behave in a way which is likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in you or in the profession. gC25 ... conduct which is likely to be treated as a breach of CD3 and/or CD5 includes ... .3 criminal conduct, other than minor criminal offences (see Guidance C27); ... .5 dishonesty;
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 P.2; R.3.1 partial
Attorneys-at-law shall not, in their professional and personal lives, act in any way which brings or which may reasonably bring the legal profession or the provision of legal services in the Cayman Islands into disrepute.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 5.1.1 strong 156 cases
A solicitor must not engage in conduct, in the course of legal practice or otherwise, which: 5.1.1 demonstrates that the solicitor is not a fit and proper person to practise law.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr12(a),13 strong 51 cases
A barrister must not engage in conduct which is: (a) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister ... A barrister must not engage in another vocation which: (a) is liable to adversely affect the reputation of the legal profession or the barrister's own reputation.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch6 — Professional standard of conduct strong 7 cases
A solicitor, whether in their professional capacity or otherwise, must not engage in any conduct that is fraudulent, deceitful, or in any way contrary to their position as a solicitor and as an officer of the court.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 2.3(c); Rule 2.12 strong 7 cases
not to engage in conduct (whether in pursuit of their profession or otherwise) which may bring the Barristers' profession into disrepute, which may injure the dignity and high standing of the profession, or which is likely to diminish the trust and confidence placed in them or in the profession;
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon III(k); Canon I(b) strong 70 cases
Where an Attorney commits any criminal offence which in the opinion of the Disciplinary Committee is of a nature likely to bring the profession into disrepute, such commission of the offence shall constitute misconduct in a professional respect ... [I(b)] An Attorney shall at all times maintain the honour and dignity of the profession and shall abstain from behaviour which may tend to discredit the profession.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code P.2; GP.6 strong
Members must not, in their professional and personal lives, act in any way which brings or which may fairly bring the legal profession or the provision of legal services in Jersey into disrepute... Disgraceful conduct (including conviction of any criminal offence, other than a minor traffic offence) outside a member's practice may place them in breach of P.2.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 2.1-1 commentary [3] strong
Dishonourable or questionable conduct on the part of a lawyer in either private life or professional practice will reflect adversely upon the integrity of the profession and the administration of justice. Whether within or outside the professional sphere, if the conduct is such that knowledge of it would be likely to impair a client's trust in the lawyer, the Law Society may be justified in taking disciplinary action.
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.2-1, commentary [3] strong 2 cases
Dishonourable or questionable conduct on the part of a lawyer in either private life or professional practice will reflect adversely upon the integrity of the profession and the administration of justice. Whether within or outside the professional sphere, if the conduct is such that knowledge of it would be likely to impair a client's trust in the lawyer, the Society may be justified in taking disciplinary action.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 1.4 strong
The kinds of conduct ... for which a lawyer ... may be disciplined are as follows: ... (c) negligence or incompetence ... so frequent as to reflect on the lawyer's fitness to practise ...; (d) conviction of an offence punishable by imprisonment where the conviction reflects on the lawyer's fitness to practise, or tends to bring the legal profession into disrepute.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.2 partial 4 cases
You must be trustworthy and act honestly at all times so that your personal integrity is beyond question.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 4(c) partial 16 cases
A legal practitioner has a duty to discharge honourably and with integrity all of the legal practitioner’s responsibilities to any tribunal before which the legal practitioner appears, the legal practitioner’s clients, the public and other members of the legal profession.
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 1.03 Commentary strong
As an Officer of the Court, proper standards of behaviour whether in his practice or in his independent business activities are required of a solicitor as a member of an honourable profession.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 4.1(b) strong
not to engage in conduct (whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise) which is:- (i) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister; (ii) likely to bring the profession of barrister into disrepute or otherwise diminish public confidence in the profession of barrister;

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

1,235 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Jonathan Peter Durkin
    SDT solicitor 12734/2025 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher James Hawkes
    SDT solicitor 12571/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Kerrison, Robert Francis
    OLSC solicitor Kerrisons Legal Services 2025-08-15 text match

    Lawyer failed to comply with a notice issued pursuant to s 371 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (Uniform Law), the Lawyer is the subject of unresolved complaints, the Lawyer’s practising certificate was previously su…

    Refusal to issue Practising Certificate for the practising period ending 30 June 2026 $0.00 Specified Duration: Manager appointed for a period of 2 years Manager Appointed: Yes Manager Appointed View decision
  • Alison Clare Banerjee
    SDT solicitor 12722/2025 2025-08-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Harry Francis Cottam
    SDT solicitor 12336/2022 2025-07-31 rule cited

    Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Buckley, Nathan Andrew
    OLSC solicitor G & B Lawyers [2025] NSWCATOD 98 2025-07-29 rule cited

    Proceedings no. 2023/00140580 (Social Media Application) 1. Made public statements encouraging residents To breach laws by providing false information to the ASIC for the purpose of avoiding the effect of applicable pub…

    Costs Order recommending removal of lawyer's name from the Supreme Court Roll $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • Matthew Stephen Becker
    SDT solicitor 12692/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Rory Peter Heddle Fordyce
    SDT solicitor 12560/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Daniel James Skinner
    SDT solicitor 12636/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • William Joseph Harris
    SDT solicitor 12738/2025 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Oliver James Saxon
    SDT solicitor 12694/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Failures, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Stuart Cottis
    SDT solicitor 12706/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Criminal Convictions, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12723/2025 2025-07-25 rule cited
    Restoration to the Roll - Refused 1 PDF View decision
  • Scott Halborg
    SDT solicitor 12667/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Alejandro Emilio Verdu Haro
    SDT solicitor 12705/2024 2025-07-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Sideris, George
    OLSC solicitor George Sideris & Associates Lawyers [2025] NSWCA 159 2025-07-18 text match

    In the course of legal practice the solicitor: sent correspondence directly to the client of another solicitor, in breach of rule 33 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW) (C…

    Costs Removal of lawyer’s name from the Roll of Australian lawyers Not a fit and proper person to remain on the Roll of Australian lawyers maintained by the Supreme Court of New South Wales, pursuant to s 22 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision
  • James Boyle
    BTAS barrister Middle Temple 2025-07-15 rule cited
    strike_off open to appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Huggins Lewis Foskett
    SDT solicitor 12702/2024 2025-07-14 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Money Laundering Regulations, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Neil Robert Lawler
    LSC-QLD solicitor Lawler Magill 2025-07-10 rule cited

    OCR198-23 Charges 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 - professional misconduct. OCR050-25 Charges 1 to 4 - professional misconduct

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • Charles Michael Stevens
    SDT solicitor 12691/2024 2025-07-03 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Failures, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher Matthew Henaghan
    LSC-QLD solicitor John Woulfe Solicitors 2025-07-03 found breached text match

    The respondent engaged in professional misconduct

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • Ano Maggielin Miller Sewell
    GLC attorney 117 of 2024 2025-06-27 rule cited

    Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered June 27, 2025. || Guilty | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered May 31, 2025. View PDF SANCTION DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF …

    Struck off, Restitution Ordered 2 PDFs View decision
  • Morieson, David Warwick
    OLSC solicitor 2025-06-25 text match

    Not a fit and proper person to hold a practising certificate

    Refusal to renew practising certificate pursuant to s 45 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) for the period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025 $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12595/2024 2025-06-19 rule cited

    Appeals

    S.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals 1 PDF View decision
  • Feisal Mohammed Raza Sheikh; Maxim Solicitors Limited
    SDT solicitor 12669/2024 2025-06-19 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Failures, Money Laundering Regulations, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.