Stephen John Roberts

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

Stephen John Roberts, a sole practitioner admitted in 1984, admitted allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor arising from his failure to progress client matters, failure to respond to Law Society correspondence, and failure to comply with two Adjudicators' directions. No dishonesty was alleged. The Tribunal accepted his mental ill health was the crucial factor. Finding him unfit to practise, it imposed indefinite suspension to protect the public, ordered £3,200 costs, and made the Adjudicators' directions enforceable as High Court Orders. The Respondent wished to be removed from the Roll.

Duties found breached:

• No improper communication with the court
• No taking unfair advantage
• Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank

Aggravating factors:

• Previous disciplinary finding in 2001 for failing to comply with an Adjudicator's decision (fined £1,000)
• Caused anxiety to clients and inconvenience to The Law Society

Mitigating factors:

• Significant mental health difficulties including clinical depression and a phobia (crucial factor in failings)
• No dishonesty alleged
• Books of account fully in order and compliant with Solicitors Accounts Rules
• Sought help from LawCare and the Samaritans
• Admitted allegations and accepted responsibility
• Public already protected as practice intervened and Respondent not practising