Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Matthew Apau Obeng & Adeyoye Adeyemi

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10472/2010
Date01/01/2010
OutcomeSuspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 34,800
Dishonesty foundNo

Two partners of Matthew Wokeson & Co (a solicitor and a Registered Foreign Lawyer) faced seven allegations relating to accounts breaches and mortgage/conveyancing misconduct. The Tribunal found all allegations proved on the documentary evidence, including acting in numerous suspicious conveyancing transactions (sub-sales with large uplifts, directly paid deposits, failure to control purchase monies), failing to disclose material information to lender clients, dealing with a bogus firm, breaching an undertaking, and inadequate supervision. No express finding of dishonesty was made. The First Respondent was suspended indefinitely from practice as a solicitor; the Second Respondent was suspended indefinitely from the Register of Foreign Lawyers. Both were made jointly and severally liable for costs of £34,800, not to be enforced without leave of the Tribunal.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Substantial financial losses to lender clients (sample transactions exceeded £5,830,000 advanced)
  • Pending claims against the compensation fund estimated at £15,000,000-£16,000,000
  • Members of the public suffered loss (e.g. £12,000 deposit on Westwell Road)
  • First Respondent was founding partner and sole operator of client account who signed Certificates of Title
  • Release of mortgage advance to FMH Ltd, a company owned/controlled by First Respondent, without lender authority
  • Second Respondent knew he should not undertake conveyancing but continued regardless
  • Failure to attend the hearing or provide explanation or demonstrate remorse

Mitigating factors:

  • First Respondent was a relatively inexperienced solicitor
  • First Respondent not solely responsible for what occurred
  • No previous disciplinary sanctions

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10472/