Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Michael Katz

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7029/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeSuspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Failures

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 893
Dishonesty foundNo

Michael Katz, a sole practitioner solicitor admitted in 1984, appeared before the Solicitors' Disciplinary Tribunal for a fourth time. He admitted failing to comply with a Direction of the Assistant Director of the Solicitors Complaints Bureau (requiring repayment and compensation to a client), failing to deliver a client's file to his representative contrary to instructions, and failing to reply to Bureau correspondence, all amounting to conduct unbefitting a solicitor. The Tribunal, concerned about his mental health and apparent unfitness to practise, suspended him from practice indefinitely (with liberty to apply for the suspension to be lifted on proof of recovery), ordered costs of £893.05, and directed the Assistant Director's Direction be treated as enforceable as a High Court order. No dishonesty was found.<br>Filing of the order was suspended for 14 days to allow an orderly handover of clients.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Three previous appearances before the Tribunal (1988, May 1995, September 1995) for broadly similar matters
  • Repeated failure to respond to the Bureau and comply with Directions
  • Award compensation and repayment remained unpaid at time of hearing

Mitigating factors:

  • Admitted the allegations
  • Significant personal and marital problems and family bereavement
  • Suffering from stress and possible mental ill health, taking antidepressants
  • Handed over a cheque for £720 to the complainant client at the hearing and apologised
  • Reduced caseload to avoid taking on new work
  • Complexity of the Mr R.W. matter with conflicting interests regarding papers

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7029/