Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Kate Jane Austen

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12758/2025
Date13/04/2026
OutcomeSuspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension12 months
CostsGBP 25,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Kate Jane Austen, a consultant solicitor at Dunn & Baker, sent three oppressive and intimidating emails to a former client (Client A) on 20 January 2023 threatening injunction proceedings, contempt of court, imprisonment and costs unless Client A withdrew complaints to the SRA and Legal Ombudsman. The intent was to intimidate Client A into not complaining. She admitted breaching Principles 2 and 5 and paragraph 7.5 of the Code, including a lack of integrity (no dishonesty finding was made). The Tribunal accepted an agreed outcome of a 12-month suspension followed by a 24-month Restriction Order limiting her to SRA-approved employment, and ordered costs of £25,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • High culpability - conduct was by design intended to intimidate Client A into not complaining
  • Concerted effort by an experienced solicitor communicating directly with a member of the public
  • Amounted to an abusive threat of litigation with exaggerated consequences (imprisonment, contempt, costs)
  • Foreseeable risk of harm to effective regulatory oversight

Mitigating factors:

  • Full admissions and cooperation with the SRA
  • Isolated lapse in an otherwise unblemished career
  • Genuine remorse and insight demonstrated
  • Steps taken to mitigate risk of repetition, including removing herself from contentious litigation
  • Emails were ultimately unsuccessful as Client A did make a complaint

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12758/