Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Anthony Patrick Rees

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number6961/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 1,034
Dishonesty foundYes

Anthony Patrick Rees, admitted 1986, faced allegations arising from an Investigation Accountant's report revealing a client account cash shortage of £129,575.31 caused by improper payments made using clients' funds, false accounting entries and concealed debit balances. He claimed to have been duped by a fraudster client (Mr M) into using client money to draw banker's drafts and make payments unconnected with the relevant clients. The respondent admitted the facts but denied dishonesty. The Tribunal found the allegations substantiated and held it hard to accept that a solicitor who knowingly used clients' funds for an improper purpose had not acted with a degree of dishonesty. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £1,034 plus the Investigation Accountant's costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Cash shortage on client account of £129,575.31
  • False entries made in the books of account at the respondent's instigation
  • Concealment of debit balances and attempts to cover up his activities
  • Improper payments made using clients' funds for purposes unconnected with the relevant clients
  • No recovery of monies; loss likely to fall on Solicitors Indemnity Fund/partners

Mitigating factors:

  • Admission of the facts
  • Genuine remorse
  • Made disclosure to partners and full disclosure to the Investigation Accountant
  • Claimed to have been the victim of an elaborate deception by a confidence-trickster client
  • Strained financial position and personal/health difficulties, facing bankruptcy
  • Positive testimonials submitted in support

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/6961/