Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Louis Stanley Spragg

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11216/2014
Date01/01/2014
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 15,297
Dishonesty foundYes

Louis Stanley Spragg, sole principal of Louis Spragg & Co, was found to have committed 18 allegations including four findings of dishonesty (applying the Twinsectra test). An SRA forensic investigation found a minimum client account cash shortage of £85,295.19, with £38,187.48 wholly unexplained, 24 unallocated transfers from client to office account totalling £34,507.71, and a £12,600 stamp duty misposting. Client money was used for the Firm's tax liabilities and to keep the overdraft below £50,000. The Tribunal, proceeding in the Respondent's absence (ill health), found him dishonest and struck him off the Roll, ordering costs of £15,297. The Respondent's bankruptcy did not reduce the costs order per Bloom v Pensions Regulator.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Minimum cash shortage of £85,295.19 on client account not replaced
  • Use of client money to pay Firm's tax liabilities (PAYE/NI)
  • Transfers made to keep Firm's overdraft lower
  • 24 unallocated transfers totalling £34,507.71
  • Misleading reconciliation statement using a reversed 'deposit in transit' of £75,712.06 to reduce apparent shortage
  • Respondent was meticulous with finances so knew of the transfers and shortage
  • Clients suffered losses to be borne by the profession

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary findings
  • Positive character evidence from Mr Burch describing him as a decent, meticulous gentleman
  • Apology and expression of shame
  • Previously good complaints, claims and accounting record
  • Ill health

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11216/